A lesson learned is
never really forgotten.
Stew Richland
In the days of old, when Knights were bold, in order for them to obtain a Knighthood by their lord, they had to learn some basic lessons on their civil obligations. This was known as the Code of Chivalry. This code emphasized courtesy to women. In most civilized societies children are taught to respect all adults and when adults are at the senior citizen level we must extend them every courtesy. “Good Form” as our British cousins observe includes opening a door, carrying a package, offering your seat and most important of all talking to seniors in a polite, moderate tone, speaking slowly so they could process your request and finally acknowledging the fact that many of these seniors are physically impaired in some way and must use a device to assist them in walking.
Well in the last few days we have seen a growing number of
incidents at our pools that clearly illustrate that our security patrol lacks
training in basic “Chivalry” training and lack the simple basic prerequisites
to deal with our more senior citizens.
A few days ago the rover security patrol was ordered to
enter our pool areas and ask bathers for their “IDs.” There were no signs posted on the entrances
to the pool area to inform residents that this was the new norm at the
pools. Prior to this, the only time a
security patrol was observed was when they drove past the pool on their rounds
and the only time they entered a pool area was in response to a call to
security when children were jumping into the pool with little regard to the
welfare of the seniors sharing the pool.
Based on the interviews that I have conducted as a member of
the P@S Committee and some of the phone calls I have received, many of these
seniors were told by security to display their IDs. Many had left their IDs at home, some were
left in their vehicles, but none carried them into the pool. Security demanded
that all IDs must be shown as proof that they were legal residents and had pool
privileges. The burden of getting out of
the pool, pushing their walkers to go to
obtain their IDs or even going out to their car was very stressful to say the
least. When many of these seniors
objected to this intrusion to their recreational time, the security guards
posture, language and tone became somewhat
rude. In one instance, two more
security cars had to be called to render assistance.
In one instance the same security guard returned to the pool
that he had visited a few hours earlier and asked the same people to show their
ID cards. One pool person shouted at the
security guard and reminded him that he was there earlier and should be able to recognize the seniors he had
already checked.
There is no question that these seniors were angry with this
new WPRF policy. Reactions ranged from refusing to show IDs to security, to
ignore them completely or to go as far as forming a committee to raise
awareness of these issues.
The problem lies directly on the shoulders of WPRF and those
who give the instructions to security.
At the very least, WPRF should have informed the seniors that use the
pool of this new initiative by the posting these new rules on the entrances of
all the pools a few weeks in advance of the policy to advise seniors that IDs
must be available when asked to show them.
In addition, the rover patrols should have been given some sort of
sensitivity training when asking seniors to display their IDs, they would not feel intimidated. At the very least, if a senior could not
produce their ID when requested, all security had to say was, “These are the
new rules, so please, the next time you come to the pool bring your ID, thank
you so much.”
I hope the powers to be consider how they deal with this
issue before it escalates to something worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment